Perhaps what is needed is for JXTG to have a parameterized "ContextBuilder" that can set up its variable context differently depending on whether it is called from sendPage*() (in which case it provides access to the FOM) or not (in which case it only provides access to the Request/Session/Context - and/or other objects...)
Seems a good idea. There should be no difference from the template POV on the availability of non-flow data (request, session, etc) whether the template is called by a flowscript or not.
Yup. And not only that: I'm starting to think that JXT could be useful even outside Cocoon, as a generic way to script JXPath/Jexl. Would it make sense to factor the "language" in a generic POJO/Component with JXTG being just a glue?
-- Gianugo Rabellino Pro-netics s.r.l. - http://www.pro-netics.com Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com (Blogging at: http://www.rabellino.it/blog/)
