On 10.04.2004 09:09, Bruno Dumon wrote:

<fi:datatype type="java.lang.Date">
 <fi:convertor pattern="dd-MM-yyyy"/>
</fi:datatype>

ok. I'll try to look into it (should be pretty trivial to add).

That would be cool. Just a comment, what maybe is obvious: The above syntax is different to the one in the definition, we should use the same one: <fi:datatype base="date">.


Thanks,

Joerg



Reply via email to