<fi:datatype type="java.lang.Date"> <fi:convertor pattern="dd-MM-yyyy"/> </fi:datatype>
ok. I'll try to look into it (should be pretty trivial to add).
That would be cool. Just a comment, what maybe is obvious: The above syntax is different to the one in the definition, we should use the same one: <fi:datatype base="date">.
Thanks,
Joerg
