On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 11:23, Joerg Heinicke wrote: > On 10.04.2004 09:09, Bruno Dumon wrote: > > >>><fi:datatype type="java.lang.Date"> > >>> <fi:convertor pattern="dd-MM-yyyy"/> > >>></fi:datatype> > > > > ok. I'll try to look into it (should be pretty trivial to add). > > That would be cool. Just a comment, what maybe is obvious: The above > syntax is different to the one in the definition, we should use the same > one: <fi:datatype base="date">.
yep, that's right. I did it like that. Now in CVS. The old fi:styling type="date" is not supported anymore, I guess that's fine? -- Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
