Why do we need both? If one of them is better than the other, let's simply use the better one and remove the worse.
Carsten > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 3:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: EHCache in its own block? > > At 9/1/2004 06:36 AM, you wrote: > >Ralph Goers wrote: > > > >>At 9/1/2004 05:24 AM, you wrote: > >> > >>>Could I move the EHCache-based store in its own block > (unstable, for > >>>now, of course)? It seems to be behaving a lot better than > JCS, and I > >>>seriously don't want to build the whole scratchpad just for one > >>>simple class and jar... > >> > >> > >>Shouldn't both JCS and EHCache be in blocks so that only > the one being > >>used is built? > > > >There should at least be a default when neither is included. > And what > >happens if both blocks are included? > > At build time I don't think restrict things so that you can > only build one of the blocks, but I'd like to be able to do > that if I want to. At run > time, only one caching framework should be configured. > >
