Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > On 1 Sep 2004, at 21:20, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler said: > >> Why do we need both? If one of them is better than the > other, let's > >> simply use the better one and remove the worse. > >> > >> Carsten > > > > I have no problem with that. I just am remembering prior > threads about > > EHCache vs JCS and it appears that some folks prefer JCS even if it > > has more problems. > > I think it might have been because in the code comments of > the EHStore there's a mention that the store is not > persistent across JVM restarts, but now it seems they "fixed" it... > > http://ehcache.sourceforge.net/documentation/#mozTocId581616 > Great. Now, I preferred JCS as well, but it seems that JCS jas some problems and often you get no response to a question/comment in the JCS community; so it seems that EHCache might be a better option.
So, let's just try it. Carsten
