On Apr 10, 2005 4:24 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > So, although we may accept a new "context" attribute (I'm currently -0.9 > > for this), I'm -1 for accepting dynamically generated sitemaps. > > I'm -1 as well. (that was easy to guess ;-)
Uhm, first of all I'd say that the "context" attribute could be really useful in contexts other than dynamic sitemaps, so I'd welcome that addition. WRT dynamic sitemaps, I don't quite have a real opinion, I can clearly see how it might lead to abuse, but I also tend to think that Cocoon, as a framework, should allow applications built on top of it using subsets of functionalities abstracted in high level configuration files. However, if it's agreed once and for all that dynamic sitemaps are to be considered harmful, so be it and let's enforce it: it slipped through already, and now it doesn't work anymore because of a bug. A check failing with an error message would be enough to prevent stupid people like me to try it again in the future (even though there will always be the http route...). Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino Pro-netics s.r.l. - http://www.pro-netics.com Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/)
