Mark Leicester wrote:
Hi,
This feels like a stupid question, but what about comments? Do people
adding comments to daisy also need to sign the CLA???!
To my mind that would be overkill. After all, we've got stacks of stuff
on the wiki that isn't covered by a CLA. Comments would fall under the
same remit.
Upayavira
On 6 Jun 2005, at 10:27, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 6 juin 05, � 10:28, Steven Noels a �crit :
...That said, we need to discuss access policies to the Daisy
instance on our Cocoon zone. It's only logical committers are
granted "User" access immediately. What about non-committer
documentation contributors?..
I suggest having a vote here before giving them access, to be
consistent with our usual way of doing things.
+1.
However, this raises the question of how they can contribute before
getting access. If they have to provide patches against existing docs,
then we loose a large part of Daisy's benefits and will refrain people
to contribute. IMO we need a kind of sandbox where non-User people can
write some docs.
Can this be achieved using a particular document collection (e.g.
sandbox or incubator) where people not yet voted User can work?
And I guess a CLA [1] is required before giving people access, as the
documentation is contributed to the ASF.
Yes, for people in the "doc-team" (a better name than "User"), but not
for people posting to the sandbox (same rule as the wiki).
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://apache.org/~sylvain http://anyware-tech.com
Apache Software Foundation Member Research & Technology Director
