Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > Wow. That would actually be a lot of backporting IMO, meaning the 2.1 > branch wouldn't be very different from the trunk! > > This feature alone will make people jump to 2.2 once we release it, even > as a beta. So I agree with Upayavira: let's release a 2.2 without OSGi > and concentrate on it for 2.3. > > And BTW, instrumentable is currently broken (I suspect some binary > incompatibility between Excalibur libraries). > Excalibur has released a new version of most libraries recently. We should upgrade.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
