On 2/15/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The changes I commited 5 days ago for r620289 introduced lots of javadocs > errors. They add a link to the addValue(double[]) method which is defined in > the > implementing class, not in the interface. > > What would be the best fix: change all the javadoc comments or push the method > up in the interface ? > > Changing the comments is a little more work (they are all similar but need to > be > reworded) but I prefer this solution since the addValue should really not > belong > to the interface IMO.
+1 - does not belong in interface. Phil > > Luc > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
