Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 2/15/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The changes I commited 5 days ago for r620289 introduced lots of javadocs
errors. They add a link to the addValue(double[]) method which is defined in the
implementing class, not in the interface.
What would be the best fix: change all the javadoc comments or push the method
up in the interface ?
Changing the comments is a little more work (they are all similar but need to be
reworded) but I prefer this solution since the addValue should really not belong
to the interface IMO.
+1 - does not belong in interface.
OK. I fixed this and a few other javadoc warnings.
I will now refrain from commiting anything before the next release step.
Will there be a new release candidate ?
Luc
Phil
Luc
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
