On Feb 16, 2008 9:43 AM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Phil Steitz a écrit : > > On 2/15/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The changes I commited 5 days ago for r620289 introduced lots of javadocs > >> errors. They add a link to the addValue(double[]) method which is defined > >> in the > >> implementing class, not in the interface. > >> > >> What would be the best fix: change all the javadoc comments or push the > >> method > >> up in the interface ? > >> > >> Changing the comments is a little more work (they are all similar but need > >> to be > >> reworded) but I prefer this solution since the addValue should really not > >> belong > >> to the interface IMO. > > > > +1 - does not belong in interface. > > OK. I fixed this and a few other javadoc warnings. > > I will now refrain from commiting anything before the next release step. > Will there be a new release candidate ? >
Yes, in progress... Phil > Luc > > > > > > Phil > >> Luc > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
