On 16/11/2009, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Henrib <hbies...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > This is a vote to release JEXL-2.0 based on RC1. > > It's been a long time since last release and many features have been > > updated. > > The API and some behaviors have changed; your validation, reactions and > > votes are important. > > > > Tag: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0_RC1/ > > > > <snip/> > > Thanks for working through the m2 release mechanics. SVN is down ATM, > so haven't looked at the tag itself.
Tag looks mainly OK, contents agree with source archive apart from doap and STATUS which are in SVN only. PROPOSAL file could probably be dropped from source archive too. Some of the CSS files don't have AL headers. Probably not necessary for the very short ones, but the others need them. > > > > Site: > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/jexl/2.0/RC1/site/index.html > > > > <snap/> > > Looks like the commons skin is not applied to the above site -- its > LnF should be similar to the site on c.a.o. > Also, the site appears to be for 1.1, not 2.0. The Javadocs for 1.0 can probably be dropped now. > > > Binaries: > > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/jexl/2.0/RC1/staged/org/apache/commons/commons-jexl/2.0-RC1/ > > The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted before deployment. > <snip/> > > When you were using version 2-0-RC1, I was under the impression you > were doing so while you were working out the release mechanics. Unless > we actually decide to release a version "2.0-RC1" (for broader > feedback from users etc.) the version in the artifacts we vote on > should simply be "2.0". > > Another thing I'd like to get feedback on from the Commons developer > community (I did bring this up a week or two ago though I think it was > part of another thread and therefore less conspicuous) is the package > name for the 2.0 release -- perhaps you could post the clirr report > (IIRC, you looked at it) so everyone can form an opinion. Thanks > again. > > > -Rahul > > > > > > [ ] +1 release it > > [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care > > [ ] -1 no, do not release it because... > > > > Thanks to all in advance, > > Henrib > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
