On 10/22/11 8:02 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 21.10.2011 23:19, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
>> Forgot to mention about checkstyle: no idea. If you built the
>> Digester
>> using the provided pom, there shouldn't be ambiguity... any hint?
>
> Being no maven guru, I haven't got a clue either. I also would
> expect that the pom contains sufficient information to have
> reproducible build results. I ran a mvn help:effective-pom, and
> here is the part I got for the configuration of the checkstyle
> plug-in:
>
>       <plugin>
>         <artifactId>maven-checkstyle-plugin</artifactId>
>         <version>2.6</version>
>         <configuration>
>           <configLocation>config/maven_checks.xml</configLocation>
>           <headerLocation>config/maven-header.txt</headerLocation>
>
> <suppressionsLocation>D:\data\projects\OpenSource\digester\commons-digester3-3.1-src/checkstyle-suppressions.xml</suppressionsLocation>
>
>
> <suppressionsFileExpression>D:\data\projects\OpenSource\digester\commons-digester3-3.1-src/checkstyle-suppressions.xml</suppressionsFileExpression>
>
>         </configuration>
>       </plugin>
>
> Do you get a similar result?

Looks like the plugin version is 2.6.  Could be the failure on
Windows is due to [1] which is fixed in 2.7.  Try changing the
plugin version to 2.7 and see if that fixes it.

Phil
[1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-149
>
> Oliver
>
>> TIA!!!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Simone Tripodi
>> <simonetrip...@apache.org>  wrote:
>>> Hi Oliver,
>>> thanks for the deep review!!
>>>
>>> I think that under a legal point of view - NOTICE file is
>>> included in
>>> the artifact - it would be better give another RC and take
>>> advantage
>>> to fix also PMD violations.
>>>
>>> Let's wait anyway for the end of the vote and see how thing go,
>>> in the
>>> meanwhile I fix what you noticed.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot, alles gute!
>>> Simo
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Oliver Heger
>>> <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de>  wrote:
>>>> Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7. Artifacts look good.
>>>>
>>>> I found the following problems:
>>>> - The Copyright in NOTICE.txt says still 2010.
>>>> - The release notes claim to be for version 3.0 in the header.
>>>> - There are some PMD errors which could be addressed (not
>>>> blocking).
>>>> - A bit strange: When I build the site locally I get 75
>>>> Checkstyle errors.
>>>> Maybe this depends on the version of the checkstyle plug-in?
>>>>
>>>> Oliver
>>>>
>>>> Am 19.10.2011 23:38, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all guys,
>>>>> I'm writing to call for a vote to release apache
>>>>> commons-digester-3.1
>>>>> based on RC1.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the 3.0 release with the new async feature - not very
>>>>> much but
>>>>> enough to justify a new release.
>>>>> Please take in consideration that broken 3.1 links will be
>>>>> fixed once
>>>>> the site will be deployed.
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will stay open for 72 hours anc closes on Saturday
>>>>> 22th, at
>>>>> 9:40pm CET.
>>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks in advance for reviewing, have a nice day!
>>>>> All the best,
>>>>> Simo
>>>>>
>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/digester/3.1/RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> Tag:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/digester/tags/DIGESTER3_3_1_RC1/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Site:
>>>>>
>>>>>    http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/digester/3.1/RC1/site/
>>>>>
>>>>> Binaries:
>>>>>
>>>>>   
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/digester/3.1/RC1/binaries/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maven Artifacts (staged on Nexus)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-080/org/apache/commons/commons-digester3/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 release it
>>>>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
>>>>> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because... (please explain why)
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to