Le 15 oct. 2013 à 07:33, Dave Brosius <dbros...@apache.org> a écrit : > I couldn't disagree more. Dormant/attic means the project has leprosy. I > don't know the answer to this, but wondering, has there ever been a commit to > an attic'ed project? I personally would never think of doing that.
As probably the only person that "supports"' Jelly, a dormant to be for sure, I find the word leprosy outrageous. I am happy to stay on list, I even read posts regularly, but I cannot find time or motivation to fix bugs or do new releases. I respond to any Jelly question I find. Jelly has gone 1.0 and is in use here and there. I would expect users to be interested to make it advance to come to jira and suggest fixes; I am happy to negotiate them and apply them, and maybe, if things get excited, there might be a release one day. However, moving it to a place where you would never commit would sign its death. Paul PS: there's a zillion software units not in active development running in your own computer and they do their job. PPS: is this thread the thread I should find instructions with to make sure Jelly is not retired? That's not what I have seen but I fear having missed something. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
