On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all, > > The second release candidate of BCEL is ready to pass under your scrutiny. > > Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC2/ > (r1627879) > > Release notes: > http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > > Distribution files: > http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/ > > Checksums (sha1): > a93e9b33dce3473da2462a709c3e904a5f569526 bcel-6.0-bin.tar.gz > 0ff280375294d9b67eba45483b94918edd753a79 bcel-6.0-bin.zip > b0a9c5054e366141fccc2bec55983bc7796b2017 bcel-6.0-src.tar.gz > bade1e07121a9a6283d87b0ad94888a99043d333 bcel-6.0-src.zip > > Site: > http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/site/ > > Javadoc: > http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/site/apidocs/ > > Maven artifacts: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1046/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/ > > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now. > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > Signatures and hashes look fine; LICENSE and NOTICE files are included in release artifacts as well as the binary jar files. `mvn package` runs successfully from the unpacked source artifacts. Site looks cosmetically fine; in the future it would be nice to work on the quality metrics, whether that be by code changes or configuration changes. +1 to release Matt > Thank you for your reviews, > > Emmanuel Bourg > > >
