On 26 September 2014 22:12, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > The second release candidate of BCEL is ready to pass under your scrutiny. > > Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC2/ > (r1627879) > > Release notes: > http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > > Distribution files: > http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/
-1 The file LICENSE-header.txt does not agree with the copy in SVN It appears to be corrupted in both source archives. The file checkstyle.xml is completely different from the one in SVN Looks like the wrong files have been uploaded -1 The directory does not contain any hashes > Checksums (sha1): > a93e9b33dce3473da2462a709c3e904a5f569526 bcel-6.0-bin.tar.gz > 0ff280375294d9b67eba45483b94918edd753a79 bcel-6.0-bin.zip > b0a9c5054e366141fccc2bec55983bc7796b2017 bcel-6.0-src.tar.gz > bade1e07121a9a6283d87b0ad94888a99043d333 bcel-6.0-src.zip Hashes don't agree with downloaded files There needs to be a link to the KEYS file in the vote e-mail > Site: > http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/site/ > > Javadoc: > http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/site/apidocs/ > > Maven artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1046/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/ > > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now. > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > Thank you for your reviews, > > Emmanuel Bourg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
