Our project LICENSE.txt file is just for the Apache 2.0 license text.

Other mentions go in the NOTICE.txt file.

For example, see Apache Commons Codec's NOTICE.txt file:

Apache Commons Codec
Copyright 2002-2016 The Apache Software Foundation

This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).

src/test/org/apache/commons/codec/language/DoubleMetaphoneTest.java
contains test data from http://aspell.net/test/orig/batch0.tab.
Copyright (C) 2002 Kevin Atkinson (kev...@gnu.org)

===============================================================================

The content of package org.apache.commons.codec.language.bm has been
translated
from the original php source code available at
http://stevemorse.org/phoneticinfo.htm
with permission from the original authors.
Original source copyright:
Copyright (c) 2008 Alexander Beider & Stephen P. Morse.

---
Gary

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org
> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gilles [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 04:41
> > To: dev@commons.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [RNG] License text location(s) (Was: [jira] RNG-18 [...])
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:44:27 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > > Le 22/09/2016 à 13:24, Gilles a écrit :
> > >
> > >> The fact is that we don't distribute the original code (in C)
> > >> but a Java port (that has undergone several transformations).
> > >
> > > That's still a derivative from the original code.
> >
> > Sure, but my point is that if release source then we already
> > comply with the author's request by copying their copyright
> > note in the Java source file.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >> It is confusing to read at times that "Apache only releases sources"
> > >> and
> > >> at other that we also release binaries...
> > >
> > > I agree, I understand this motto as "We don't have to release
> > > binaries
> > > if we don't want to".
> >
> > OK; in that case, we do release binaries and have to put another
> > copy of the copyright notice...
> [orcmid]
>
> My understanding is that, for Apache, "release" is reserved for Source
> Code although <<http://apache.org/dev/release.html> although
> non-distributions are also producible and always built from a released
> source however.
>
> Diligence with respect to IP in binaries that come as project
> distributions still applies, including handling of LICENSE and NOTICE, only
> this time specific to the distribution.  There may be more about that.
>
> >
> >
> > Gilles
> >
> > >
> > > Emmanuel Bourg
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to