2020-07-23 1:37 UTC+02:00, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org>: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:51 AM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> 2020-07-23 0:14 UTC+02:00, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org>: >> >> >> >> You act, and I must react? >> >> Do I really have to spell it in even more words than >> >> above? >> >> >> > >> > You just sent me a message I didn't want - and I need to delete it now >> > ;) >> > >> > But tongue in cheek aside. We are on a dev list. >> > Commits, issues all generate traffic that are caused by other people. >> >> I'm sure that you see the difference between a bot-generated >> message and a post by a human. >> > > TBH not in terms of your "you act, and I must react" argument.
It was not an argument, but a statement of fact. Did you missed/skip the start of the thread, where I merely asked what was the flood (like I don't think we've have ever seen) about? My remark came after getting a blunt reply that I should read those messages (though they obviously weren't even fitted to be read in a mail client) and go figure out (after the fact) how to not see them. >> If you are not willing to deal with that, we might have very different >> > expectations. >> >> My expectations did not change, as I explain in the [VOTE] thread >> about the purposes of "issues@". >> > > I didn't say they changed, but they do seem to be very different from mine. > Care to share your experience of dealing with those hundreds of bot posts? Mine is that either I can get useful info out of them, or I should not receive them. [Getting automatic messages, and having them thrown away automatically upon reception seems like a useless dissipation of heat.] The problem is that indeed some messages from "issues@" are useful (otherwise I would have unsubscribed already...). Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
