Le 2021-05-06 13:06, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
It is not nice to decide for others what they may need.
It is not nice to suggest I shouldn't voice my opinions.
It would have been courteous to acknowledge the answers to your argument against having a dedicated component
I've little appetite for lengthy debate with you again.
My rationale, for whether a specific component is needed, has always been the same: Define a scope (and stick to it). You seem to find this acceptable for any Commons project except those which you tagged as "math-related".
The machine learning scope is too wide, it doesn't belong here.
So I'm asking: Will it make any difference if the "machine learning" codes are further developed within [Math]? Concretely: * Would you vote to release CM v4.0? * Would you help (more than if the ML codes were in a specific component) to review/merge the PRs?
I'd would vote favorably for a modularized CM 4.0 release, but I still think that the math related components would be best served in their own TLP with a dedicated community free of the Apache Commons rules and constraints.
Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
