[moving comdev back to bcc] On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:06 AM Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 2019, at 8:59 AM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:57 AM Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > >> > >> Consider the effort along the lines of development... all development > >> needs to be done on list. > > > > Not all committees operate along the lines of development. > > Independent of that, we often complement lists with calls, meetups, > > hackathons, etc. > > > > To the extent that this group does produce tangible products, the > > development of those products do need to follow the norms of the ASF; > > development may happen on or off list, but needs to be brought back to > > the list, and everybody given an opportunity to participate. > > > > Umm a "call/videocall to discuss the proposal details to the board." > certainly sounds like a "tangible product" to me. > > You are free to disagree. I think doing so would be a mistake.
As I said, this has evolved in ways differently than I would have expected. My email to Griselda, copying Ross was as follows: >> Perhaps we should "meet" via call/video to discuss next steps? I'm >> concerned with all the various ways this organization has to discourage >> such efforts that it will eventually stall. >> >> I'm on the east coast, and have plenty of afternoon (my time) slots >> available tomorrow (Wednesday) and Thursday. I'm not available Friday. >> If that doesn't work out, we can shoot for next week. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
