Hi The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641 While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can be downloaded here: http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/ <http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/ <http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/ <http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/ Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback. [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because... The vote will be open for 72 hours. Thanks, -- Marica On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll start the release today :-) > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Is it a GA release? I think it should be. >> >> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me >> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the >> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem >> there too. >> >> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA >> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338. >> >> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already >> been four months since 1.3.4. >> >> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3 >> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the >> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA. >> >> -- >> Wendy >> > >
