+1 for Beta. I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I was able to run and build a project.
I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box - possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this before a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO. - Brett On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote: > Hi > > The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged. > > This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes > here: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641 > > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can be > downloaded here: > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/ > > <http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/ > > <http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/ > > <http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/ > > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback. > > [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because... > > The vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > Thanks, > -- > Marica > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'll start the release today :-) >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be. >>> >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me >>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the >>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem >>> there too. >>> >>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA >>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338. >>> >>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already >>> been four months since 1.3.4. >>> >>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3 >>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the >>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA. >>> >>> -- >>> Wendy >>> >> >> -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
