+1 for Beta. - verified signatures and checksums - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed build scenarios
- Marica On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for Beta. > > I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I was > able to run and build a project. > > I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box - > possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this before > a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO. > > - Brett > > On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote: > > > Hi > > > > The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged. > > > > This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes > > here: > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641 > > > > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can > be > > downloaded here: > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/ > > > > < > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/ > > > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/ > > > > < > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/ > > > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/ > > > > < > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/ > > > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/ > > > > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback. > > > > [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because... > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Marica > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I'll start the release today :-) > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be. > >>> > >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me > >>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the > >>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem > >>> there too. > >>> > >>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA > >>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338. > >>> > >>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already > >>> been four months since 1.3.4. > >>> > >>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3 > >>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the > >>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Wendy > >>> > >> > >> > > -- > Brett Porter > [email protected] > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > >
