It big. Certainly would be more efficient to lazy load, and cache so offline works.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Gord Tanner <gtan...@gmail.com> wrote: > There was some issues over download size for our cli, any idea what the size > of all the platforms are? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2013-03-22, at 1:42 PM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> I'm content to have the vendoring, it has some advantages as you wrote. >> >> However, I would also very much like to add a platform that's running from >> somewhere on my local disk, as I described in my feature request in the doc. >> >> So I propose a flag like cordova platform add android >> --target=../../cordova-android where that local directory can have >> whatever locally patched code I want. >> >> Braden >> >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> >>> Right now we put the release of Cordova into the npm package for >>> cordova-cli and we version lock the two. (Codova/CLI 2.5.x === >>> Cordova/Platform 2.5.latest). >>> >>> We did this because: >>> >>> - has to work offline >>> - cannot have a Git dep to do development >>> - issue tracking locked to the real version of Cordova >>> >>> We can solve all these issues. The code to do that isn't really a huge >>> deal. But to add it we gain very little that isn't already achieved by >>> vendoring. I'd like for us to be aware the current can be improved but >>> its low priority compared to, say, ripple and plugin integration. >>>
