If you previously cloned platforms and plugins into some global location, you should be able to create a new HelloWorld app while offline, by using --link (for both platforms and plugins).
Does that work? On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > Yep, my biggest concern is that we are able to use CLI but still work > against master. I think braden's ask covers that though. > > What good is working offline if you have no plugins? Are you suggesting > that we also include some set of plugins inside of cordova-cli? > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > > It big. Certainly would be more efficient to lazy load, and cache so > > offline works. > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Gord Tanner <gtan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > There was some issues over download size for our cli, any idea what the > > size of all the platforms are? > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > On 2013-03-22, at 1:42 PM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >> I'm content to have the vendoring, it has some advantages as you > wrote. > > >> > > >> However, I would also very much like to add a platform that's running > > from > > >> somewhere on my local disk, as I described in my feature request in > the > > doc. > > >> > > >> So I propose a flag like cordova platform add android > > >> --target=../../cordova-android where that local directory can have > > >> whatever locally patched code I want. > > >> > > >> Braden > > >> > > >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Right now we put the release of Cordova into the npm package for > > >>> cordova-cli and we version lock the two. (Codova/CLI 2.5.x === > > >>> Cordova/Platform 2.5.latest). > > >>> > > >>> We did this because: > > >>> > > >>> - has to work offline > > >>> - cannot have a Git dep to do development > > >>> - issue tracking locked to the real version of Cordova > > >>> > > >>> We can solve all these issues. The code to do that isn't really a > huge > > >>> deal. But to add it we gain very little that isn't already achieved > by > > >>> vendoring. I'd like for us to be aware the current can be improved > but > > >>> its low priority compared to, say, ripple and plugin integration. > > >>> > > >
