On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > I attached a patch that is extremely trivial, but I'd like to hear if > anyone has feed back on the merits or if there's just a better way > that I'm not thinking of. >
I think this is a good way to do it (and useful for other things). The patch looks solid. I'd have to look more closely at the code to see if the update_seq's interactions with deferred commit need to be accounted for here. -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com
