On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Chris Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I attached a patch that is extremely trivial, but I'd like to hear if >> anyone has feed back on the merits or if there's just a better way >> that I'm not thinking of. >> > > I think this is a good way to do it (and useful for other things). The > patch looks solid. I'd have to look more closely at the code to see if > the update_seq's interactions with deferred commit need to be > accounted for here. >
Good call. I didn't think to hard about anything other than just taking what was in the db record when the notification was sent. > > > -- > Chris Anderson > http://jchris.mfdz.com >
