On 19/01/2009, at 5:05 PM, Antony Blakey wrote:
The ideas from the other thread about having a UUID per db and
compaction are interesting, are either of those included the fs
layout
stuff you were working on?
No. UUIDs are useful for the fs because you need a strictly
functional mapping from name -> file, and using a UUID is begging
the question.
s/UUIDs are useful/UUIDs are *not* useful/
Antony Blakey
-------------
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
In anything at all, perfection is finally attained not when there is
no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to
take away.
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
