Oops, forgot that status update. I reran the scripts for the mirrors on git.apache.org using the same version of git-svn I used to generate the last writable git repo. The result was that it calculated the same hashes as what we had so I feel comfortable blaming this on the different git-svn versions.
Bottom line, any project that already has a mirror on git.apache.org will just use that as the basis for the new writable repo so that hashes will are preserved. On Friday, September 23, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote: > +1 assuming the writeable repo has the same hashes as the current read-only > mirror. > > Adam > > On Friday, September 23, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Paul J. Davis wrote: > > > Dear committers, > > > > We now have a green light from infrastructure to switch to using Git as our > > writable VCS. This is to be considered a live experiment. If something > > breaks its possible we'll have to revert back to SVN. But nothing will > > break and everyone will forgive me for any bugs that may crop up. > > > > If there are no objections I would like to switch over soonish. Normally I > > would say Monday to give people a chance to respond to this email but we've > > had quite a few discussions on switching to Git already and no one has > > voiced opposition. Seeing as that's the case if I get a majority of +1's > > from the committers I'll start disabling SVN access as soon as I see the > > majority vote. > > > > Paul Davis
