+1 much praise to Paul for this! On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Paul J. Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > Oops, forgot that status update. > > I reran the scripts for the mirrors on git.apache.org using the same version > of git-svn I used to generate the last writable git repo. The result was that > it calculated the same hashes as what we had so I feel comfortable blaming > this on the different git-svn versions. > > Bottom line, any project that already has a mirror on git.apache.org will > just use that as the basis for the new writable repo so that hashes will are > preserved. > > > On Friday, September 23, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote: > >> +1 assuming the writeable repo has the same hashes as the current read-only >> mirror. >> >> Adam >> >> On Friday, September 23, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Paul J. Davis wrote: >> >> > Dear committers, >> > >> > We now have a green light from infrastructure to switch to using Git as >> > our writable VCS. This is to be considered a live experiment. If something >> > breaks its possible we'll have to revert back to SVN. But nothing will >> > break and everyone will forgive me for any bugs that may crop up. >> > >> > If there are no objections I would like to switch over soonish. Normally I >> > would say Monday to give people a chance to respond to this email but >> > we've had quite a few discussions on switching to Git already and no one >> > has voiced opposition. Seeing as that's the case if I get a majority of >> > +1's from the committers I'll start disabling SVN access as soon as I see >> > the majority vote. >> > >> > Paul Davis > >
-- Chris Anderson http://jchrisa.net http://couchbase.com
