That's enough of a consensus for me. I'll ask for SVN writes to be disabled and bring up the new Git repo. I'll send emails when SVN goes down and Git comes up.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:00 PM, Filipe David Manana <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 as well Paul > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 >> >> On 23 September 2011 21:18, Randall Leeds <[email protected]> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 13:52, Paul J. Davis >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Dear committers, >>>> >>>> We now have a green light from infrastructure to switch to using Git as our >>>> writable VCS. This is to be considered a live experiment. If something >>>> breaks its possible we'll have to revert back to SVN. But nothing will >>>> break >>>> and everyone will forgive me for any bugs that may crop up. >>>> >>>> If there are no objections I would like to switch over soonish. Normally I >>>> would say Monday to give people a chance to respond to this email but we've >>>> had quite a few discussions on switching to Git already and no one has >>>> voiced opposition. Seeing as that's the case if I get a majority of +1's >>>> from the committers I'll start disabling SVN access as soon as I see the >>>> majority vote. >>>> >>>> Paul Davis >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Filipe David Manana, > > "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. > Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. > That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
