On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Bob Dionne <dio...@dionne-associates.com> wrote: > I kind of agree, though I think voting is neat. I'd like to think most of > these features are influenced by experiences with users in addition to > internal refactoring concerns and so forth. > > It might help for everyone to see the list of features (here's a cleaned up > version I got from BobN) [1]. As Benoit suggests, we need to sort/categorize > them first before attaching priorities. > > One thing we might think of is the areas they might be grouped in, along the > line of teams as Jan suggested at the summit.
We are actually all agree on the need to have focus points. I still strongly disagree with this idea of team. But yes we should organize the things in different topics. > > I'm happy to maintain this list as we drill down into the specifics, > summarize email threads, and IRC chats. Some of these, .eg. moving metadata > out of the docs, could easily require a lot of detailed discussion as they > hit many areas of the code, so we should flesh out the details. > I was thinking we could start a wiki and organize things in a table or so . Thoughts? - benoît
