Yes, perhaps the next move is a wiki page for these items (deduplicated and with better names and descriptions).
B. On 14 April 2012 18:11, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Bob Dionne > <dio...@dionne-associates.com> wrote: >> I kind of agree, though I think voting is neat. I'd like to think most of >> these features are influenced by experiences with users in addition to >> internal refactoring concerns and so forth. >> >> It might help for everyone to see the list of features (here's a cleaned up >> version I got from BobN) [1]. As Benoit suggests, we need to sort/categorize >> them first before attaching priorities. >> >> One thing we might think of is the areas they might be grouped in, along the >> line of teams as Jan suggested at the summit. > > We are actually all agree on the need to have focus points. I still > strongly disagree with this idea of team. But yes we should organize > the things in different topics. > >> >> I'm happy to maintain this list as we drill down into the specifics, >> summarize email threads, and IRC chats. Some of these, .eg. moving metadata >> out of the docs, could easily require a lot of detailed discussion as they >> hit many areas of the code, so we should flesh out the details. >> > > I was thinking we could start a wiki and organize things in a table or > so . Thoughts? > > - benoît
