On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 16:27, Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> wrote: > With all due respect and appreciation for your efforts.... marketing is one > thing, utility is another. While there's value to marketing, (IMHO) utility > counts more. We're not talking about a magazine ad, we're talking about a > web site that people have taken some effort to find and go to - they're > (we're) looking for information - if the information isn't there, it doesn't > matter how pretty the site is.
I'm sure Noah agrees with you, and the information/utility value will get added soon. However, there's also plenty of value to be found in having a site that's easy on the eyes. Perhaps the balance swung a little too far in the marketing direction this time, but that will get corrected. Arguing over it on this mailing list doesn't really help at this point -- pointing out stuff that you would like to be able to easily access and isn't, currently, (like your MarkMail point, on which I probably agree) does. Even better if you add notes like that to the aforementioned wiki page. Cheers, Dirkjan
