Thanks Hans! I think Noah is also interested in getting the whole build tools/scripts imported so it doesn't live outside of Apache CouchDB anymore.
Can you comment on what would be needed there? Cheers Jan -- On 14.10.2012, at 17:19, Hans J Schroeder <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Noah > >> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3? > > Yes, Benoit mentioned a few things which need to be fixed: > > " > On Jun 18, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> I have some problems with the current binary linked on the homepage. >> Not with the binary by itself which works but with the branding. >> >> 1. Titte in about is "CouchDB Server" I don't know what it's means. If >> linked on the homepage, it should be "Apache CouchDB" imo and nothing >> else. Other than that we should just link it on the wiki. >> 2. Copyright. imo we should only have the apache copyright for >> anything "official". How these copyrights will work if we include the >> osx build in the sources btw ? >> 3. Since the source code isn't in the apache couchdb repository, a >> link to the OSX sources should be provided in the ABOUT. It's not >> required by the aoache 2 license, but generally we expect to find the >> sources in the repository when it comes from an apache project? >> >> Anyway both can be fixed when the sources will be included in the repo >> (Is the process started) ? > > " > > 1. -> Change Title to "Apache CouchDB" > 2. -> should be no problem > 3. -> Add link to sources in the about box > >> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos? > > The build is basically a wrapper around the standard CouchDB disk layout. The > additional wrapper code could be merged into a sub-folder of the repository > called for instance "couchdbx-app". > > How is this done for the Windows build? > >> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them. > > I will update the code to include 1., 2. and 3. > > - Hans > > > On Oct 14, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > >> Hans, >> >> Great news! >> >> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3? >> >> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos? >> >> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them. >> >> Thanks, >> >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Hans J Schroeder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Noah, >>> >>> I have done the OS X build and I am there to upgrade it to 1.3. >>> >>> - Hans >>> >>> >>> On Oct 14, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >>> >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails. >>>> (See subject prefix!) >>>> >>>> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages. >>>> >>>> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to >>> fix. >>>> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate on >>> it >>>> a little? >>>> >>>> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for >>> this >>>> release? >>>> >>>> Any volunteers to head up these efforts? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> NS >> >> >> -- >> NS >
