Hi Noah, I'm just climbing out of the hole at work today, so I'll be able to look at this tomorrow (Tuesday the 30th).
-Joan --- Joan Touzet | [email protected] | wohali@efnet On 28 October 2012 11:53, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Hans, > > What changes do we need to make to get this into CouchDB proper? Do you > need any assistance? > > Thanks! > > > On 24 October 2012 23:25, Hans J Schroeder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Noah, >> >> At my side the required changes are not yet ready. >> >> - Hans >> >> On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly. >> > >> > On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release? >> > >> > @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your work >> in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in to. >> > >> > @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take? >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > Hey, >> > > >> > > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails. >> > > (See subject prefix!) >> > > >> > > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages. >> > > >> > > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to >> fix. >> > > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate >> on it >> > > a little? >> > > >> > > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for >> this >> > > release? >> > > >> > > Any volunteers to head up these efforts? >> > >> > Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-) >> > >> > I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include an >> > R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for people >> > to spend ages getting a dev environment set up. >> > >> > @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky >> > attempts a year ago. That would be cool. >> > >> > I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out in >> testing. >> > >> > Nothing else major comes to mind "down here". >> > >> > A+ >> > Dave >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > NS >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > NS >> >> > > > -- > NS >
