Cooll, appreciate that! Hoping to get some of this sorted for 1.3, which is largely dependant on me fixing up these docs. I think our biggest concern right now is the OS X thing. I am not at all happy with it being on Github, but over the moon it exists in the first place. If we could get some movement on this, even if it's just a tiny bit, in the right direction, then I would be overjoyed.
On 29 October 2012 15:24, Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Noah, > > I'm just climbing out of the hole at work today, so I'll be able to look > at this tomorrow (Tuesday the 30th). > > -Joan > --- > Joan Touzet | [email protected] | wohali@efnet > > > On 28 October 2012 11:53, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Hans, >> >> What changes do we need to make to get this into CouchDB proper? Do you >> need any assistance? >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> On 24 October 2012 23:25, Hans J Schroeder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Noah, >>> >>> At my side the required changes are not yet ready. >>> >>> - Hans >>> >>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly. >>> > >>> > On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release? >>> > >>> > @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your >>> work in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in to. >>> > >>> > @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take? >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > Hey, >>> > > >>> > > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails. >>> > > (See subject prefix!) >>> > > >>> > > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages. >>> > > >>> > > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need >>> to fix. >>> > > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe >>> iterate on it >>> > > a little? >>> > > >>> > > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package >>> for this >>> > > release? >>> > > >>> > > Any volunteers to head up these efforts? >>> > >>> > Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-) >>> > >>> > I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include an >>> > R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for people >>> > to spend ages getting a dev environment set up. >>> > >>> > @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky >>> > attempts a year ago. That would be cool. >>> > >>> > I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out in >>> testing. >>> > >>> > Nothing else major comes to mind "down here". >>> > >>> > A+ >>> > Dave >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > NS >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > NS >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> NS >> > > -- NS
