On May 22, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22 May 2013 18:11, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 on moving RPM/DEB meta data into the main source tree. (Jan, these tools >> expect specific top level dirs/files, but they're usually self-contained. >> As you say, we can change things if it gets cluttered.) >> >> Benoit, what about maintaining rpms/debs on Apache infra? Is there any >> reason we'd want to use Ubuntu PPAs, when we can just set up an APT >> repository with something like reprepro, and stick it on dist.apache.org. > > I think this is a great idea, although I don't fully understand > reprepro nor the work involved yet. > > If cloudant is still supporting their spidermonkey builds, we should > use those, if not, I'd like to re-use their build packages, and point > to erlang-solutions OTP builds. This should be a pretty solid > arrangement. > > A+ > Dave We're definitely still using our SM 185 packages. I can't remember the last time we had to update them, though. Adam
