On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on moving RPM/DEB meta data into the main source tree. (Jan, these tools > expect specific top level dirs/files, but they're usually self-contained. > As you say, we can change things if it gets cluttered.) > > Benoit, what about maintaining rpms/debs on Apache infra? Is there any > reason we'd want to use Ubuntu PPAs, when we can just set up an APT > repository with something like reprepro, and stick it on dist.apache.org. > I'm all for having the tools in our repo. The PPA is a good plus for the (many) user of ubuntu around. I think we could have both. It shouldn't give more work and would increase our presence around imo.
- benoit
