To make this is not that I want to be on launchpad or whatever, just found that it could be useful for some to be there. But I won't stand on it if most think it is requiring too much works or is useless.
- benoit On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hmm, okay. >> >> But add-apt-repository surely works with a regular URL too? > > yes >> >> What about Debian users? Can they use the same PPA? Or are we only >> targeting Ubuntu for now? >> > > It is apparently possible, but never tested. > > > Why not to have both. Of course we should support debian. Diversity is > important. I like the position of nginx about that. Actually the > ubuntu ppa is unofficial but they add "may be more fitting for your > environment." Which is the reason I think we could have both. Nginx > also maintain its own debian repo. > > - benoit > > >> >> On 22 May 2013 20:51, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Does Ubuntu streamline the process of adding the PPA to your >>> > /etc/apt/sources.list? >>> >>> yes, for ex: >>> >>> sudo add-apt-repository ppa:couchdb/apache-couchdb >>> >>> done. >>> >>> It can also do the work for us when it's about building the package >>> for the different ubuntu release. >>> Again having a presence of launchpad may also be good for us in term of >>> image. >>> >>> - benoit >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> NS
