On 16 April 2014 15:28, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Benoit, if you'd like review, can you put some info together? We can > > circulate this on dev@ at first, and then do a blog post, and promote > > via social media. > > > > > > I did many posts during the merge here asking for a review: > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=dev%40couchdb.apache.org&q=rcouch+status > > That should help any dev interested in the review. > > COUCHDB-1994 can be used to track any review. wohali started some here: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994 > > Any information on the rcouch wiki are still valid also: > > https://wiki.refuge.io/display/RCOUCH/rcouch > > Hope it helps. > > - benoit > > in addition one could have a look into this for testing https://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40couchdb.apache.org/msg29495.html
> On 6 April 2014 10:22, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi again, > > >> > > >> Benoit's mentioned that the rcouch import is more or less complete > from > > >> his perspective. No doubt we'll have some mucking around wrt docs, > > fauxton, > > >> build etc to sort out, but he feels its ready to go. > > >> > > >> > > > > > > More or less from my perspective is nothing. I would be more interested > > to > > > see any activity from other developers in reviewing that code instead > of > > > adding new changes (except fixes) to the current code base. Right now > > > neither the couchdb project or me see any benefit in my gift since > noone > > to > > > my knowledge did a real (and public) review it, started to use it or > > even > > > considered to start to merge it upstream. Instead of spending all this > > time > > > for free in cleaning the code I could have just took a long vacation > and > > > continue to ad improvements on my own, which I did since. > > > > > > > > > > > >> How are things going in bigcouch? > > >> > > >> To be clear, we *should* make a decision of this magnitude in a > separate > > >> VOTE thread, but let's discuss > > >> further here and I will try to summarise & shepherd towards a > consensus. > > >> > > > > > > We already have a consensus actually something near a consensus defined > > > months ago: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1999 > > > > > > In my perspective, we can probably start to define these milestones. > > > > > > > > > - benoit > > > > > > > > -- > > Noah Slater > > https://twitter.com/nslater > > > -- Andy Wenk Hamburg - Germany RockIt! http://www.couchdb-buch.de http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
