What about doing a blog post? On 16 April 2014 15:36, Andy Wenk <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16 April 2014 15:28, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Benoit, if you'd like review, can you put some info together? We can >> > circulate this on dev@ at first, and then do a blog post, and promote >> > via social media. >> > >> > >> >> I did many posts during the merge here asking for a review: >> >> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=dev%40couchdb.apache.org&q=rcouch+status >> >> That should help any dev interested in the review. >> >> COUCHDB-1994 can be used to track any review. wohali started some here: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994 >> >> Any information on the rcouch wiki are still valid also: >> >> https://wiki.refuge.io/display/RCOUCH/rcouch >> >> Hope it helps. >> >> - benoit >> >> > in addition one could have a look into this for testing > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40couchdb.apache.org/msg29495.html > > >> On 6 April 2014 10:22, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi again, >> > >> >> > >> Benoit's mentioned that the rcouch import is more or less complete >> from >> > >> his perspective. No doubt we'll have some mucking around wrt docs, >> > fauxton, >> > >> build etc to sort out, but he feels its ready to go. >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > More or less from my perspective is nothing. I would be more interested >> > to >> > > see any activity from other developers in reviewing that code instead >> of >> > > adding new changes (except fixes) to the current code base. Right now >> > > neither the couchdb project or me see any benefit in my gift since >> noone >> > to >> > > my knowledge did a real (and public) review it, started to use it or >> > even >> > > considered to start to merge it upstream. Instead of spending all this >> > time >> > > for free in cleaning the code I could have just took a long vacation >> and >> > > continue to ad improvements on my own, which I did since. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> How are things going in bigcouch? >> > >> >> > >> To be clear, we *should* make a decision of this magnitude in a >> separate >> > >> VOTE thread, but let's discuss >> > >> further here and I will try to summarise & shepherd towards a >> consensus. >> > >> >> > > >> > > We already have a consensus actually something near a consensus defined >> > > months ago: >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1999 >> > > >> > > In my perspective, we can probably start to define these milestones. >> > > >> > > >> > > - benoit >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Noah Slater >> > https://twitter.com/nslater >> > >> > > > > -- > Andy Wenk > Hamburg - Germany > RockIt! > > http://www.couchdb-buch.de > http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de > > GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
-- Noah Slater https://twitter.com/nslater
