On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote:
> What about doing a blog post? > My time is very limited these days, if anyone want to take the lead on this, that would be cool. - benoit > > On 16 April 2014 15:36, Andy Wenk <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 16 April 2014 15:28, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > Benoit, if you'd like review, can you put some info together? We can > >> > circulate this on dev@ at first, and then do a blog post, and promote > >> > via social media. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> I did many posts during the merge here asking for a review: > >> > >> > >> > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=dev%40couchdb.apache.org&q=rcouch+status > >> > >> That should help any dev interested in the review. > >> > >> COUCHDB-1994 can be used to track any review. wohali started some here: > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994 > >> > >> Any information on the rcouch wiki are still valid also: > >> > >> https://wiki.refuge.io/display/RCOUCH/rcouch > >> > >> Hope it helps. > >> > >> - benoit > >> > >> > > in addition one could have a look into this for testing > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40couchdb.apache.org/msg29495.html > > > > > >> On 6 April 2014 10:22, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dave Cottlehuber < > [email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Hi again, > >> > >> > >> > >> Benoit's mentioned that the rcouch import is more or less complete > >> from > >> > >> his perspective. No doubt we'll have some mucking around wrt docs, > >> > fauxton, > >> > >> build etc to sort out, but he feels its ready to go. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > More or less from my perspective is nothing. I would be more > interested > >> > to > >> > > see any activity from other developers in reviewing that code > instead > >> of > >> > > adding new changes (except fixes) to the current code base. Right > now > >> > > neither the couchdb project or me see any benefit in my gift since > >> noone > >> > to > >> > > my knowledge did a real (and public) review it, started to use it > or > >> > even > >> > > considered to start to merge it upstream. Instead of spending all > this > >> > time > >> > > for free in cleaning the code I could have just took a long vacation > >> and > >> > > continue to ad improvements on my own, which I did since. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> How are things going in bigcouch? > >> > >> > >> > >> To be clear, we *should* make a decision of this magnitude in a > >> separate > >> > >> VOTE thread, but let's discuss > >> > >> further here and I will try to summarise & shepherd towards a > >> consensus. > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > We already have a consensus actually something near a consensus > defined > >> > > months ago: > >> > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1999 > >> > > > >> > > In my perspective, we can probably start to define these milestones. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > - benoit > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Noah Slater > >> > https://twitter.com/nslater > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Andy Wenk > > Hamburg - Germany > > RockIt! > > > > http://www.couchdb-buch.de > > http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de > > > > GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 > > > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc > > > > -- > Noah Slater > https://twitter.com/nslater >
