+1 Thanks, Noah!
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > Sensible. Thanks for catching this! > > +1 > > Best > Jan > -- > > > On 28.07.2014, at 16:55, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello folks, > > > > In a discussion between myself, Joan, and Bob on IRC today, it became > > clear that there are some major errors that need fixing ASAP. > > > > Here's my candidate doc that we are voting on: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=44302814 > > > > This vote uses majority approval model and expires in 72 hours. > > > > Please review and cast your vote. > > > > The page history is messy, but here is a list of the changes I made, > > in order of importance. The last half are a wrap-up of all the > > outstanding errata. > > > > - Dropped "majority approval" approval model, as this allowed blocking > > -1 votes on non-technical decisions. Confirmed with other major > > contributors to the bylaws that this did not match our intentions > > > > - Updated decision table to use "lazy majority" or "lazy 2/3 majority" > > instead of "majority approval" as necessary > > > > - Clarified that "veto" only applies to -1 votes using RTC > > > > - Change our most preferred method of decision making to "Lazy > > consensus or RTC" per Bob's feedback that we actually have two primary > > decision making models, one for code and one for everything else > > > > - Dropped a redundant sentence about the Chair not being a leader > > > > - Changed "RTC Approval & Vetos" to "RTC and Vetos" so anchors work > > > > - Fixed internal anchors, and added a few additional ones > > > > - Added example about using email TAGS > > > > - Tightened up wording about the PMC delegating responsibility > > > > - Minor fixes for wording and case > > > > Thank you, > > > > -- > > Noah Slater > > https://twitter.com/nslater >
