Thanks folks. I added it here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=44302833&selectedPageVersions=3&selectedPageVersions=2 We are now voting on the following changeset: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=44302833&selectedPageVersions=3&selectedPageVersions=1 (Apologies for the in-situ edit!) People who vote after this email: PLEASE CONFIRM YOU UNDERSTAND AN EDIT WAS MADE. Thanks. It's important to be rigorous here. :) On 28 July 2014 21:16, Jason Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > เมื่อ วันอังคารที่ 29 กรกฎาคม ค.ศ. 2014, Joan Touzet <[email protected]> > เขียนว่า: > >> Noah asked me to clarify what I mean here. >> >> I vote +1, with the understanding that the clarification he has listed >> below is the intent of the rule. >> >> -Joan >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Joan Touzet" <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> >> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 1:28:26 PM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Amend CouchDB bylaws >> >> With this modification, I concur. +1 on these changes, and thanks for >> getting this and the minor errata from others merged into a single vote >> so promptly! >> >> -Joan >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Noah Slater" <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> >> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 12:58:49 PM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Amend CouchDB bylaws >> >> Dang. Where I say that a -1 never has the power to block a vote, I >> really mean a *single* -1 vote. Of course, -1 votes can still block a >> vote if you have enough of them. The point is that they're not vetos >> >> I don't think this is enough for me to abort the vote, as the rules >> are quite clear in the approval models section. This only serves as a >> clarification of the statement that a -1 vote is not *called* a veto >> outside of RTC. >> >> If you think this is important enough to restart the vote, I shall do so. >> >> In the mean time, I have created an Errata document: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Errata >> >> On 28 July 2014 18:25, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > Sensible. Thanks for catching this! >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > Best >> > Jan >> > -- >> > >> >> On 28.07.2014, at 16:55, Noah Slater <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello folks, >> >> >> >> In a discussion between myself, Joan, and Bob on IRC today, it became >> >> clear that there are some major errors that need fixing ASAP. >> >> >> >> Here's my candidate doc that we are voting on: >> >> >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=44302814 >> >> >> >> This vote uses majority approval model and expires in 72 hours. >> >> >> >> Please review and cast your vote. >> >> >> >> The page history is messy, but here is a list of the changes I made, >> >> in order of importance. The last half are a wrap-up of all the >> >> outstanding errata. >> >> >> >> - Dropped "majority approval" approval model, as this allowed blocking >> >> -1 votes on non-technical decisions. Confirmed with other major >> >> contributors to the bylaws that this did not match our intentions >> >> >> >> - Updated decision table to use "lazy majority" or "lazy 2/3 majority" >> >> instead of "majority approval" as necessary >> >> >> >> - Clarified that "veto" only applies to -1 votes using RTC >> >> >> >> - Change our most preferred method of decision making to "Lazy >> >> consensus or RTC" per Bob's feedback that we actually have two primary >> >> decision making models, one for code and one for everything else >> >> >> >> - Dropped a redundant sentence about the Chair not being a leader >> >> >> >> - Changed "RTC Approval & Vetos" to "RTC and Vetos" so anchors work >> >> >> >> - Fixed internal anchors, and added a few additional ones >> >> >> >> - Added example about using email TAGS >> >> >> >> - Tightened up wording about the PMC delegating responsibility >> >> >> >> - Minor fixes for wording and case >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Noah Slater >> >> https://twitter.com/nslater >> >> >> >> -- >> Noah Slater >> https://twitter.com/nslater >> -- Noah Slater https://twitter.com/nslater
