Thanks for information On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote:
> There wasn't any announcements, so much likely no. Personally, I > cannot run it today. > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:30 AM, madhuka udantha > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Will the weekly meeting be held today? > > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:16 AM, ASF IRC Bot < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Summary of IRC Meeting in #couchdb-meeting at Wed Mar 18 20:01:39 2015: > >> > >> Attendees: Wohali, arun_agarwal, Buddhika, Kxepal, Ndeeshaan, > >> sebastianrothbuc, nslater, jan____, klaus_trainer, robertkowalski, > >> rkowalski__ > >> > >> - Preface > >> - fauxton status > >> - rcouch merge > >> - couchperuser > >> - Google Summer of Code (GSoC) > >> - Action: robertkowalski to start vote for couchperuser > >> - couchdb-www / [email protected] > >> - couchdbdocker > >> - nano import > >> - _bulk_revs > >> - 2.0 > >> - Action: robertkowalski writes a text about the process > >> - Action: Kxepal and jan____ to figure out consolidation of install > >> instructions > >> > >> > >> IRC log follows: > >> > >> ## Preface ## > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:02:48 2015] <robertkowalski>: I would like to welcome > >> Ndeeshaan who participates in this gsoc > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:02:55 2015] <robertkowalski>: :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:02:57 2015] <robertkowalski>: hi! > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:03:17 2015] <arun_agarwal>: I am also a first timer here > :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:03:21 2015] <sebastianrothbuc>: great - welcome! > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:03:38 2015] <robertkowalski>: hi arun_agarwal! welcome! > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:03:55 2015] <arun_agarwal>: Hi Robert and everyone in the > >> team. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:04:15 2015] <jan____>: heya arun_agarwal & Ndeeshaan > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:04:21 2015] <Ndeeshaan>: Hi all > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:04:51 2015] <Kxepal>: Ndeeshaan: arun_agarwal hi and > >> welcome (: > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:07:56 2015] <jan____>: robertkowalski: wanna go with your > >> topics? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:08:08 2015] <robertkowalski>: ok! > >> ## fauxton status ## > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:09:00 2015] <robertkowalski>: the fauxton testsuite > >> (integration tests) will be running on couchdb 2 soon, PR is already in > >> review > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:09:34 2015] <robertkowalski>: for the mango interface > that > >> means that we can write integration tests for it. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:09:47 2015] <robertkowalski>: current status of mango: > you > >> can create indexes and list them > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:10:04 2015] <robertkowalski>: garren currently works on > >> rewriting the all-docs-list to react > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:10:36 2015] <robertkowalski>: if you know fauxton, you > will > >> know that the all-docs-list is a horrible, grown, godobject the refactor > >> solves a lot of problems > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:11:16 2015] <jan____>: nice! > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:11:17 2015] <robertkowalski>: michelle rewrites > activetasks > >> in react > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:11:32 2015] <robertkowalski>: and we have a lot of > smaller > >> bugfixes in the pipeline > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:12:14 2015] <robertkowalski>: it think that's it for > >> fauxton, i expect the first part of mango getting merged next week, > behind > >> a small feature-flip > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:12:22 2015] <robertkowalski>: so interested folks can > test > >> it already > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:12:33 2015] <robertkowalski>: and the code is integrated > >> into master > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:12:49 2015] <jan____>: why a feature flip? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:13:12 2015] <robertkowalski>: currently it is just > possible > >> to create and list indexes > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:13:15 2015] <robertkowalski>: not to query > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:13:44 2015] <robertkowalski>: but i would like to > integrate > >> into master early and don't want users think it is a bug and create jira > >> tickets > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:13:53 2015] <robertkowalski>: + to > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:14:14 2015] <jan____>: got it, thanks! > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:14:19 2015] <robertkowalski>: > >> http://locahlhost:8000/mydatabase?beta=enableQuery > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:14:30 2015] <robertkowalski>: and then the menu-point > gets > >> visible > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:15:25 2015] <jan____>: cool trick :) > >> ## rcouch merge ## > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:15:50 2015] <robertkowalski>: jan____: yes, easy as pie > but > >> very useful > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:16:07 2015] <robertkowalski>: i was wondering what the > >> status of the rcouch merge is > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:16:22 2015] <robertkowalski>: and Kxepal answered on the > ML > >> that one feature got merged, the others not > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:16:25 2015] <Wohali>: not sure rnewson or davisp are here > >> to talk about it > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:16:33 2015] <Kxepal>: robertkowalski: it's stalled. we > need > >> a hero and benoitc to pick the features from those branch > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:16:52 2015] <Wohali>: some of the features are > incompatible > >> in their current state, or are broken by clustering > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:17:17 2015] <Kxepal>: but some features are very useful > >> like lagger configuration > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:17:25 2015] <robertkowalski>: hmmm... is it still > supposed > >> to land in 2.0? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:17:33 2015] <Kxepal>: robertkowalski: partially > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:17:45 2015] <Wohali>: the logging configuration has been > >> touched differently on master with lager > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:17:46 2015] <Kxepal>: full merge wasn't in priority > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:18:15 2015] <Wohali>: i think making any more rcouch > merge > >> actions for 2.0 a priority will significantly delay its release > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:18:24 2015] <Wohali>: not saying there's not useful stuff > >> but beware scope creep! > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:18:55 2015] <robertkowalski>: fully agreed! > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:19:20 2015] <Wohali>: moving on unless there's more to > say > >> here > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:19:20 2015] <jan____>: yeah, I think we agreed on getting > >> 2.0 out and then port over more things > >> ## couchperuser ## > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:19:43 2015] <robertkowalski>: klaus_trainer pinged me > >> yesterday > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:20:18 2015] <robertkowalski>: he would like to move > >> couchperuser to the asf and would also like to maintain it > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:20:21 2015] <jan____>: Bob Ippolito wrote this little > >> plugin that creates a user DB when a user signs up. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:20:31 2015] <jan____>: it’s small and useful and he’d be > >> fine with donating it to the ASF > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:20:40 2015] <robertkowalski>: thanks jan, sorry for not > >> providing context > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:20:41 2015] <jan____>: I wouldn’t mind taking this on as > an > >> off-by-default feature > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:21:04 2015] <jan____>: plus klaus is already working on > >> making it for 2.0 etc. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:21:09 2015] <Wohali>: +1, off-by-default, assuming there > >> are some tests added and it doesn't break in clustered mode > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:21:13 2015] <klaus_trainer>: See > >> https://github.com/KlausTrainer/couchperuser > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:21:20 2015] <Kxepal>: I guess we need to run a vote and > IP > >> clearance then > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:21:32 2015] <jan____>: I’d be happy to be the officer > that > >> runs the import paperwork > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:21:49 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: thank you a lot for that! > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:21:59 2015] <jan____>: Wohali: has tests, don’t know > about > >> cluster mode yet, klaus_trainer? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:22:22 2015] <Buddhika>: Hi peple :D > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:22:22 2015] <jan____>: been doing imports lately, don’t > >> mind it :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:22:29 2015] <klaus_trainer>: Currently there are no tests > >> that we can use right now. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:22:35 2015] <robertkowalski>: i am happy to help out > >> jan____ if klaus_trainer has questions, as i did that for mango with > jan____ > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:22:37 2015] <Wohali>: jan____: as always the hard thing > is > >> that many plugins make assumptions that aren't cluster-safe, e.g. being > the > >> "only" node involved in something, making assumptions about locking > things > >> down, etc. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:23:19 2015] <jan____>: Wohali: yeah, looking forward how > >> klaus_trainer is solving this :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:23:23 2015] <Wohali>: yay > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:23:40 2015] <Wohali>: i'd say get the ip clearance done, > >> put in a branch, hopefully clean up for official 2.0 release > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:24:20 2015] <Wohali>: anything else? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:24:32 2015] <klaus_trainer>: Sounds good. I'm definitely > >> willing to do more work on it assuming that we can integrate it. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:24:38 2015] <Wohali>: yay > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:24:40 2015] <Wohali>: moving on > >> ## Google Summer of Code (GSoC) ## > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:24:46 2015] <robertkowalski>: shall i kick off a vote on > >> the dev-ml for the codebase? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:24:51 2015] <jan____>: in addition, would say this isn’t > >> blocking 2,0 > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:25:06 2015] <Wohali>: agreed, not a 2.0 blocker, get it > in > >> a branch and put in 2.0 if we can make it sane > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:25:23 2015] <jan____>: robertkowalski: +1 > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:25:49 2015] <robertkowalski>: ok > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:26:04 2015] <robertkowalski>: so we are particiapting in > >> this years google summer of code! > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:26:17 2015] <jan____>: #action robertkowalski to start > vote > >> for couchperuser > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:26:22 2015] <jan____>: \o/ > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:26:38 2015] <klaus_trainer>: Yay! > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:26:48 2015] <robertkowalski>: Ndeeshaan and Buddhika are > >> also here today > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:27:13 2015] <robertkowalski>: I think we have 5 students > >> that are interested > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:27:38 2015] <robertkowalski>: and the deadline for the > >> proposals is in 1-2weeks > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:28:12 2015] <Ndeeshaan>: 27 th of March is the deadline > >> precisely :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:28:46 2015] <robertkowalski>: we are still searching for > >> mentors, jan____ is mentoring the queryserver protocol improvements, > and i > >> am mentoring for fauxton > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:29:19 2015] <robertkowalski>: but more mentors would be > >> even better! :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:29:20 2015] <Wohali>: i'm sorry that i can't volunteer > this > >> time > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:30:11 2015] <robertkowalski>: Buddhika: I will look for a > >> template for the proposal tonight for you and Ndeeshaan > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:30:24 2015] <robertkowalski>: and the other students > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:30:40 2015] <Buddhika>: That would be great > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:30:46 2015] <jan____>: Wohali: do not worry! <3 > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:30:48 2015] <robertkowalski>: Wohali: no worries! next > year! > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:31:20 2015] <Ndeeshaan>: robertkowalski: Thanks a lot > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:31:36 2015] <robertkowalski>: we are also happy to help > >> with the proposals, at least where we can > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:32:25 2015] <robertkowalski>: i think thats it so far > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:32:32 2015] <Buddhika>: We'll try to prepare draft > >> proposals as soon as possible. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:32:48 2015] <Buddhika>: We have one week to refine them. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:33:27 2015] <robertkowalski>: cool! > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:33:38 2015] <Ndeeshaan>: I have completed my draft > proposal > >> and I can send it :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:34:17 2015] <robertkowalski>: awesome! > >> ## couchdb-www / [email protected] ## > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:35:49 2015] <jan____>: we have a new git repo couchdb-www > >> that infra is testing git-based website publishing > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:37:10 2015] <jan____>: it isn’t 100% live yet, but the EU > >> mirror of the web server is already backed by it. So if we now want to > make > >> any changes, we have to do it in SVN and git, but only for a short > while, > >> until more projects signed up to use git and INFRA moves us over fully > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:37:34 2015] <robertkowalski>: jan____: \o/ > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:37:43 2015] <jan____>: in addition, we agreed to set up a > >> [email protected] mailing list and it exists now, but nothing is happening. > Does > >> anyone have any insight as to why? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:37:45 2015] <robertkowalski>: jan____: is it on github? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:38:11 2015] <jan____>: no github mirror yet > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:38:14 2015] <robertkowalski>: jan____: i guess everyone > is > >> waiting for github to send PRs > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:38:49 2015] <jan____>: yeah, I’ve been pushy, but infra > is > >> also busy with other stuff > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:39:26 2015] <robertkowalski>: jan____: at least i am > doing > >> that (waiting) before writing to www@ that we have git now > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:39:30 2015] <jan____>: but about www@ — what are we > >> waiting for? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:40:45 2015] <robertkowalski>: arun_agarwal is also > >> subscribed waiting for github prs > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:41:31 2015] <robertkowalski>: at least i asked him to do > >> that > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:42:07 2015] <arun_agarwal>: robertkowalski: yup, true > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:42:09 2015] <jan____>: ok, thanks! > >> ## couchdbdocker ## > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:45:24 2015] <jan____>: just FYI: The couchdb-docker > project > >> is also being imported from github, necessary paperwork on their end has > >> been filed, next step is getting the IP clearance going, will do that > this > >> week. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:45:37 2015] <Kxepal>: \o/ > >> ## nano import ## > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:47:13 2015] <jan____>: Garren has been sorting out the > >> legal paperwork for nano, and we are close. once that is all done, we’ll > >> start the usual import procedure, I’m also shepherding that. > >> ## _bulk_revs ## > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:48:53 2015] <jan____>: I’m interested in optmising > >> replication performance using _bulk_revs / COUCHDB-2310 > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:49:25 2015] <jan____>: we are basically waiting for a > patch > >> from benoitc, but if that doesn’t materialise, I’ll look at doing it > from > >> scratch. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:49:38 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: I had a talk with him > today > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:49:40 2015] <Wohali>: +1 to try from scratch > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:49:51 2015] <Kxepal>: he'll try to find a time to make it > >> soon > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:49:53 2015] <jan____>: Kxepal: any news? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:50:15 2015] <jan____>: Kxepal: ok, nice to hear. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:50:46 2015] <robertkowalski>: Kxepal: did he mention a > >> specific timeframe in that he wants to try to find time? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:50:50 2015] <jan____>: I have a week or two before I can > >> look into it proper, so that would be my cutoff date > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:51:23 2015] <robertkowalski>: jan____: ah ok, good idea > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:51:24 2015] <Kxepal>: robertkowalski: no, but that's in > his > >> priority list todo for couchdb now as I understood. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:52:03 2015] <Kxepal>: so let's give him a little bit time > >> to finish the job > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:52:13 2015] <jan____>: k > >> ## 2.0 ## > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:54:19 2015] <robertkowalski>: i was one week away but i > >> think nothing has happened for 2.0, right? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:54:51 2015] <robertkowalski>: i still did not have time > to > >> work on my items, blocked by mango and other stuff > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:54:59 2015] <jan____>: small things, as far as I can see > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:55:02 2015] <Kxepal>: robertkowalski: nothing criminal, > >> right > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:55:52 2015] <jan____>: I did some local hacking on the > >> build/packaging stuff, but need to find more time, nothing to show yet > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:56:22 2015] <robertkowalski>: jan____: can i send you a > pr > >> with my script that pulls names out of the subrepos? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:56:41 2015] <robertkowalski>: i talked to several people > >> and they all said we don't need the number of commits > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:57:09 2015] <jan____>: just commit to my branch > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:57:17 2015] <robertkowalski>: because the exact number of > >> commits is broken as some commmits are still in the old couchdb master > >> branch, some not > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:57:34 2015] <arun_agarwal>: jan____: is there any jira > >> ticket where the hack steps are documented? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:58:00 2015] <jan____>: arun_agarwal: which hack steps > >> specifically? > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:58:15 2015] <arun_agarwal>: jan____: on build/packaging > >> stuff. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:59:02 2015] <arun_agarwal>: jan____: was just curious, > >> nothing specific :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:59:17 2015] <jan____>: arun_agarwal: hm, there isn‘t much > >> to explain > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:59:36 2015] <jan____>: arun_agarwal: I’m currently > working > >> here https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/302 > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:59:39 2015] <arun_agarwal>: jan____: ohk. I see, please > go > >> ahead. > >> [Wed Mar 18 20:59:58 2015] <jan____>: there is some feedback that I need > >> to incorporate > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:00:22 2015] <jan____>: and I think I’m blocked by a > cyclic > >> dependency, but I’ll figure it out. Might have to rename ./configure to > >> ./bootstrap > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:00:34 2015] <jan____>: or strip some stuff from > ./configure > >> and move it into a ./bootstrap, but not 100% sure yet > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:00:58 2015] <jan____>: anything else on 2.0? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:00:58 2015] <arun_agarwal>: jan____: sure. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:02:06 2015] <robertkowalski>: oh sebastianrothbuc you > write > >> "BTW: so did copying in 1.6.1 files, calling them from local port, > >> replicating them up to the cluster port." - does that fix COUCHDB-2593 > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:02:09 2015] <robertkowalski>: ? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:02:28 2015] <robertkowalski>: > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2593 - maybe you can > take a > >> look later > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:03:03 2015] <sebastianrothbuc>: at least I tried to > destroy > >> something in such a setup (i.e. copy "old" 1.6.1 .couch files into the > 2.0 > >> data dir > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:03:05 2015] <sebastianrothbuc>: but it just works > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:03:10 2015] <sebastianrothbuc>: you get the databases on > >> the local port > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:03:19 2015] <sebastianrothbuc>: you can create one (same > >> name) on the cluster port > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:03:20 2015] <sebastianrothbuc>: replicate > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:03:22 2015] <sebastianrothbuc>: and that's it > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:03:23 2015] <jan____>: I’d like to start looking at > running > >> the 1.x JS test suite against master, so we can see how compatible 1.x > and > >> 2.0 are going to be. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:03:42 2015] <jan____>: This will require some changes and > >> reorganisation to the tests, but I think it’ll be very worth it, if we > want > >> to make upgrades as painless as possible > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:04:02 2015] <jan____>: (nice) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:04:10 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: js test suite need in > global > >> refactoring, since it still remember the days when it ran from browsers > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:04:30 2015] <sebastianrothbuc>: can't we run it from > >> browser again? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:04:38 2015] <Kxepal>: "some changes" may be not a trivial > >> to made > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:04:59 2015] <Kxepal>: sebastianrothbuc: no, because some > >> browsers (I didn't mention chome) are buggy on some cases > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:05:07 2015] <jan____>: I know there was a lot of work on > >> other sort of tests as well, but as far as I can tell, they are all > >> tailored for 2.0/master. I’m specifically interested in 1.x compat and I > >> think the JS tests cover the API well and have yet only run against the > >> local interface > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:05:15 2015] <jan____>: why does it need a major refactor? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:05:37 2015] <jan____>: they run in browsrs and on the CLI > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:05:46 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: because it's full of > terror > >> if you're trying to figure why test fails. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:06:06 2015] <jan____>: all we need to do is point them at > >> the cluster port and disable the ones that we don’t expect to work > (_config > >> etc) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:06:23 2015] <jan____>: Kxepal: I’ve lived in that world > for > >> many years, I’m not afraid > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:06:37 2015] <jan____>: and I don’t want to refactor the > >> tests because I specificallyw ant to run out 1.x suite against 2.0 > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:06:44 2015] <jan____>: once we are over, we can do > whatever > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:06:52 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: not sure to hug you or > call > >> a hero > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:07:19 2015] <jan____>: lol <3 > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:07:54 2015] <jan____>: I’mma bring this up on dev@ > >> separately to hear from folks > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:08:12 2015] <Kxepal>: good call > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:08:28 2015] <jan____>: I think that will flush out some > >> more things we need to do, but after that, we are getting closer to the > >> final stretch > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:09:00 2015] <robertkowalski>: short question reagrding > the > >> logo process > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:09:50 2015] <robertkowalski>: i talked to sean and he > would > >> take the proposed position on the mailinglist. can i propose him or how > >> does it work? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:10:53 2015] <jan____>: what do you mean “proposed > position“ > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:11:46 2015] <robertkowalski>: nslater sent an mail to the > >> mailing list: > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-marketing/201503.mbox/%3CCAPaJBx4gf-yAnMPDGrKnWuN-FsC0dmuBeNLvaVpcDCyAr5CYGQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:12:08 2015] <robertkowalski>: "The community selects a > >> person or person(s) to > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:12:09 2015] <robertkowalski>: do the design. That person > is > >> then entrusted to do the stuff. No > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:12:10 2015] <robertkowalski>: voting necessary. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:12:11 2015] <robertkowalski>: " > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:13:26 2015] <Kxepal>: robertkowalski: ok, but we have a > >> group of people that made a logo. each own with own vision and > arguments. > >> what's now? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:13:31 2015] <jan____>: good question, I think yeah, just > >> nominate him > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:13:54 2015] <jan____>: design by committee! > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:14:11 2015] <robertkowalski>: Kxepal: so far no one got > >> nominated by anyone > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:14:28 2015] <robertkowalski>: but i am also not sure what > >> we do if we have multiple nominations. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:14:32 2015] <robertkowalski>: hmm.. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:14:39 2015] <nslater>: I'm at a gig > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:14:47 2015] <robertkowalski>: Wohali: what do you think? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:14:50 2015] <nslater>: just to say: my email was just a > >> recommendation > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:14:56 2015] <jan____>: I’m in favour of letting a > >> professional designer take this on. They can work with the other > proposal > >> people to figure out which way to go > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:15:01 2015] <nslater>: let's do whatever makes sense > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:15:02 2015] <jan____>: ultimately the PMC decides > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:15:08 2015] <jan____>: nslater: get out of here > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:15:10 2015] <nslater>: my words are not golden > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:15:13 2015] <jan____>: nslater: <3 > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:15:16 2015] <nslater>: :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:15:31 2015] <nslater>: cya! > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:15:53 2015] <jan____>: what is important: we will hurt > >> people’s feelings, we need to be prepared to do this > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:16:01 2015] <jan____>: this isn’t everybody throws their > >> patch/+1 in > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:16:20 2015] <Wohali>: sorry i was lying down > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:16:39 2015] <Wohali>: can someone give me a quick > question > >> as to "what do you think" means? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:17:21 2015] <robertkowalski>: Wohali: we are unsure about > >> the process regarding the logo and how to proceed with the many > submissions > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:17:31 2015] <jan____>: I like Noah’s suggestion, the PMC > is > >> the customer and makes the final call, they work with a nominated > designer > >> that works out one or more proposals with the other community folks. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:17:40 2015] <jan____>: community gets to vote on > >> preferences, PMC makes a call. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:18:03 2015] <jan____>: I have no qualms about having > >> Sean/Cloudant be that designer > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:18:04 2015] <Wohali>: agree, PMC is the ajudicator and > >> probably will result in a PMC vote. We need to review the bylaws on this > >> one to ensure there's appropriate precedent there > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:19:16 2015] <robertkowalski>: Wohali: you mean adding > that > >> process to the bylaws? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:19:21 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: mmm...I'd like to argue > you, > >> but not now > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:19:39 2015] <Wohali>: robertkowalski: all standards re: > >> voting are in the bylaws. not sure if this is covered. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:19:47 2015] <jan____>: Kxepal: let’s do it on marketing@ > — > >> I’ll reply there > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:19:52 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: ok > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:19:54 2015] <Wohali>: as for picking a designer/design > >> group, well, that's ultimately also a PMC decision but with community > input > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:20:13 2015] <Wohali>: in general in the past I've seen > more > >> of a " > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:20:15 2015] <Wohali>: oops > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:20:23 2015] <Wohali>: community vote on these things. We > >> picked the top 5, what do you think? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:20:27 2015] <jan____>: I’d say as per > >> http://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#types this is the “Create or > amend > >> official document” category > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:20:42 2015] <Wohali>: true, logo is an official thing > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:21:10 2015] <Wohali>: tthat says the vote would be on the > >> dev list, lazy 2/3rds, with PMC members only being binding votes > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:21:15 2015] <Wohali>: taht is consistent > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:21:34 2015] <Wohali>: but deciding how we get that logo > >> done is a non-technical decision which is up to the committers > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:21:58 2015] <jan____>: maybe we can simplify things and > >> just have anyone (including Sean) propose their work, we do a community > >> preference vote and then PMC decided > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:22:11 2015] <jan____>: no need to make a designer BDFL > for > >> the logo, all designers are BDFL for their proposal > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:22:12 2015] <Wohali>: i think that's fair, as long as a > set > >> timeline happens > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:22:27 2015] <Wohali>: e.g. all submissions by march 31 > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:22:34 2015] <Wohali>: public vote by april 15 > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:22:36 2015] <jan____>: Wohali: I’d say how the designers > >> make the logo is up t them :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:22:39 2015] <Wohali>: pmc decision by april 30 > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:22:44 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: Wohali wise ideas > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:22:54 2015] <Wohali>: given we've had a lot of > submissions > >> this gives just enough time to pick your best submissions > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:23:01 2015] <Wohali>: we could even say 1 submission per > >> designer > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:23:01 2015] <jan____>: as long as we have the option to > >> abort if nothing’s good, I’d be fine with that > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:23:11 2015] <Wohali>: pmc vote could include "d > onothing," > >> sure > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:23:22 2015] <jan____>: I like that > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:23:25 2015] <robertkowalski>: Wohali: great input! > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:23:29 2015] <jan____>: get an alter ego if you want to > have > >> 2 > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:23:38 2015] <Wohali>: hehe, no sock puppets please > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:23:50 2015] <jan____>: cool, that sounds like we have a > plan > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:23:59 2015] <jan____>: robertkowalski: do you feel like > >> writing this up? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:24:03 2015] <jan____>: :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:24:07 2015] <robertkowalski>: Wohali: thank you so much! > :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:24:12 2015] <Wohali>: it's what I do. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:24:30 2015] <robertkowalski>: jan____: if you could give > me > >> a review before i send to the ML > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:24:45 2015] <robertkowalski>: jan____: then for sure! > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:24:50 2015] <jan____>: robertkowalski: always! > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:25:23 2015] <jan____>: Wohali: ^5 — thanks for talking > this > >> through, I think we’ve got something here. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:25:58 2015] <arun_agarwal>: Wohali: one quick question. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:26:04 2015] <robertkowalski>: one question: if some folks > >> (commiters, pmc) are against changing the logo > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:26:18 2015] <robertkowalski>: do they vote -1 in the > >> committer vote? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:26:26 2015] <Wohali>: no no the committer vote is "vote > for > >> your favourite" > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:26:31 2015] <Wohali>: and we include the original logo as > >> an option > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:26:45 2015] <robertkowalski>: Wohali: ah thank you! > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:26:47 2015] <Wohali>: then the PMC vote is to > accept/reject > >> the suggestios of the commitmters > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:26:50 2015] <Wohali>: arun_agarwal: go ahead > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:27:29 2015] <arun_agarwal>: Wohali: which team decides > the > >> genuinty of the logo that people are proposing.. the selected logo > design > >> could be "inspired" from some > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:27:35 2015] <arun_agarwal>: other logo and that could be > >> problem later on. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:27:48 2015] <arun_agarwal>: do we have a team which > brings > >> this as intellectual property? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:28:15 2015] <Wohali>: Apache does have legal council who > >> can help review these things, yes, as we intend to file the new logo > under > >> trademark / service mark law > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:28:18 2015] <jan____>: #action robertkowalski writes a > text > >> about the process > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:28:31 2015] <jan____>: arun_agarwal: there is a > trademarks > >> group at Apache, we’d run the final logo by them > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:29:20 2015] <arun_agarwal>: Wohali, jan____: hmm I see.. > >> that would be great, because while it unites us, we probably won't have > lot > >> of time redoing this :D > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:29:46 2015] <jan____>: arun_agarwal: good call! :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:30:17 2015] <Wohali>: yes i think that happens after the > >> committer vote > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:30:21 2015] <jan____>: fwiw, the current logo is > >> dangerously close to the German soccer league: > >> https://encrypted.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=bundeliga&tbs=imgo:1 > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:30:25 2015] <Wohali>: because if #1 is a problem, #2 in > the > >> ranking might not be > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:30:34 2015] <Wohali>: jan, haha > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:30:41 2015] <Wohali>: i don't fancy fighting FIFA! > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:30:52 2015] <jan____>: lol yeah, no > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:32:03 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: where do you see couch on > >> bundesliga logo? they aren't close. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:32:12 2015] <Wohali>: Kxepal: it's a joke, i think > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:32:18 2015] <jan____>: huh? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:32:32 2015] <Wohali>: i don't think they'd seriously come > >> after us, but i do see the similarity > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:32:40 2015] <Kxepal>: sorry, seems like my humor process > >> died > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:32:42 2015] <Wohali>: but, it might be hard to file for > the > >> trademark > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:32:49 2015] <jan____>: white shape with pronounced legs > on > >> red background > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:32:54 2015] <jan____>: totally close. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:32:59 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: too abstract description > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:33:14 2015] <jan____>: it is worse when you see it in > >> real-life here, I have one on my commute and it gets me every time > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:33:29 2015] <jan____>: they aren’t pixel-perfect copies, > >> but if you see one casually trust me, you will think CouchDB :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:33:35 2015] <jan____>: all this is off topic for now > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:33:53 2015] <Kxepal>: yea, and that's a question for > >> lawyers (: > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:33:58 2015] <jan____>: let’s wrap this :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:34:08 2015] <rkowalski__>: \o/ > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:34:44 2015] <arun_agarwal>: if all done, I have one quick > >> point. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:34:52 2015] <jan____>: shoot > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:34:59 2015] <arun_agarwal>: can someone fill the red TBD > @ > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Installing+CouchDB > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:35:28 2015] <arun_agarwal>: few new tech have introduced > >> starting 2.0. should we add that or get rid of this table? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:35:56 2015] <jan____>: arun_agarwal: ICU/Curl: same as > 1.x > >> / autoconf/make no longer required > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:36:16 2015] <Wohali>: i don't think curl is still > required > >> in 2.0 > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:36:27 2015] <jan____>: incorrect > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:36:29 2015] <Kxepal>: Wohali: it need for tests iirc > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:36:30 2015] <Wohali>: at least, i think i removed the > req't > >> for that in dbcore prior to the merge? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:36:31 2015] <jan____>: :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:36:38 2015] <Wohali>: oh. boo. guess that didn't get > merged. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:36:54 2015] <jan____>: still needed for CLI JS tests > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:36:59 2015] <jan____>: it is optional > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:00 2015] <robertkowalski>: we have this wiki page, > >> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/blob/master/INSTALL.Unix and the > >> official docs > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:01 2015] <Wohali>: k > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:04 2015] <jan____>: and off by default > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:08 2015] <robertkowalski>: oh and > >> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/blob/master/README-DEV > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:10 2015] <Wohali>: yeah no auto*, but we need rebar > now > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:21 2015] <Wohali>: and there are the extra req'ts for > >> building fauxton > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:29 2015] <arun_agarwal>: rebar and nodejs? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:32 2015] <jan____>: yeah, as mentioned on the ML, I’m > >> worried about duplication of content here > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:35 2015] <Wohali>: and npm > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:35 2015] <robertkowalski>: and they are all in > different > >> way outdated and up to date > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:46 2015] <robertkowalski>: can we remove some? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:51 2015] <jan____>: and grunt etc. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:37:59 2015] <jan____>: see the fauxton readme for fauxton > >> deps > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:38:14 2015] <arun_agarwal>: yes, we have so many links > and > >> many-many are dead > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:38:18 2015] <robertkowalski>: fauxton does not need a > >> globally installed grunt soon any more > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:38:25 2015] <jan____>: > >> http://couchdb.apache.org/developer-preview/2.0/ shows what is needed > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:38:35 2015] <arun_agarwal>: for one topic we should > ideally > >> have one doc and all other should be soft link to the detailed one > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:38:37 2015] <jan____>: we should only keep INSTALL.md and > >> DEVELOPER.md — everything else should link to them > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:38:38 2015] <arun_agarwal>: :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:38:47 2015] <sebastianrothbuc>: +1 on that > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:38:58 2015] <arun_agarwal>: jan____: +1 > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:39:00 2015] <jan____>: robertkowalski: nice use of future > >> past tense there :D > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:39:35 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: and one for docs, or > >> transform *.md into .rst to make them inclusive for docs > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:39:57 2015] <Wohali>: agree > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:40:17 2015] <jan____>: Kxepal: then we have tow places > again > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:40:31 2015] <arun_agarwal>: Kxepal: but that won't > generate > >> twiki? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:40:37 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: after transform we don't > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:40:46 2015] <arun_agarwal>: oh sorry.. got it > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:40:53 2015] <jan____>: then we should put it all in the > >> .rst docs and have INSTALL.rst and DEVELOPER.rst generated from there at > >> build time > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:40:54 2015] <arun_agarwal>: twiki will just link to these > >> markdowns > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:41:07 2015] <jan____>: arun_agarwal: let’s not also add > >> this to the wiki, we are trying to consolidate, not spread : > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:41:26 2015] <jan____>: :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:41:31 2015] <jan____>: right :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:41:31 2015] <arun_agarwal>: jan____: yup.. understood and > >> agree .. my bad...:) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:41:49 2015] <jan____>: no worries > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:41:52 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: mmm..you suggest to build > >> the couchdb, make the docs first? (: > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:42:30 2015] <jan____>: the requirements are: we need two > >> top level source tree files that we can have in tarballs (ideally also > git) > >> and two places in the docs where the user and dev setup are explained. > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:42:48 2015] <sebastianrothbuc>: can one not link to these > >> docs on github and that's it? > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:43:00 2015] <jan____>: maybe we can make it that the top > >> level INSTALL.rst and DEVELOPER.rst are included in the docs build > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:43:04 2015] <Kxepal>: sebastianrothbuc: no internet case > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:43:06 2015] <jan____>: that would be easiest > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:43:16 2015] <robertkowalski>: sebastianrothbuc: yes i > would > >> prefer that > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:43:16 2015] <Kxepal>: jan____: yeap, clear > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:43:28 2015] <jan____>: offlineofflineoffline :) > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:43:50 2015] <jan____>: robertkowalski: no go, can’t be > >> online > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:43:57 2015] <jan____>: Kxepal: cool, let’s work on that > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:44:09 2015] <jan____>: #action Kxepal and jan____ to > figure > >> out consolidation of install instructions > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:44:30 2015] <Kxepal>: deal (: > >> [Wed Mar 18 21:45:47 2015] <jan____>: ASFBot: meeting end > >> > >> > >> Meeting ended at Wed Mar 18 21:45:47 2015 > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Madhuka Udantha > > http://madhukaudantha.blogspot.com > -- Cheers, Madhuka Udantha http://madhukaudantha.blogspot.com
