Thanks Joan, I’m looking forward to Infra feedback. Best Jan —
> On 22. May 2020, at 19:31, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: > > I haven't gotten a lot of feedback on this proposal. (I know a lot of people > are marching towards deadlines right now.) I also don't want to take it to > users@, unless there's a reality of it happening. > > In the interest of moving this forward, I'm going to open an exploratory > issue with Infra to see how much work it'd be to make this happen. Hopefully, > we're not the first people to ask. > > We'll still need a vote here, or on users@, before we would actually move > activity to GH Discussions, but it won't be the gating factor for a while > yet, I bet. > > FYI, per our project guidelines/bylaws, this would be a non-technical > decision, allowing for lazy consensus and a lazy majority (3 binding +1s, > more binding +1s than binding -1s), with binding votes cast by committers, > and no vetos. > > -Joan > > On 2020-05-12 14:41, Joan Touzet wrote: >> On 2020-05-12 5:46 a.m., Ilya Khlopotov wrote: >>> I would be +1 as long as it works and we have options to migrate archive >>> elsewhere if/when we need to. >>> You are proposing to mirror email traffic which means that mail archive >>> would have a complete history and spare the project from total vendor lock >>> in. >>> >> Yup, that'd be a requirement from the ASF's perspective, regardless of >> technology we select. >> -Joan >>> Best regards, >>> ILYA >>> >>> On 2020/05/11 19:04:53, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> On 2020-03-15 9:36, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, at 14:35, Naomi Slater wrote: >>>>>> apparently GitHub has discussions now. it's still in beta, but you can >>>>>> specifically request it if you want it if you contact support, I think >>>>>> >>>>>> e.g., https://github.com/zeit/next.js/discussions >>>>>> <https://github.com/zeit/next.js/discussions> >>>>> >>>>> interesting. >>>>> >>>>>> I'm interested to know what we think about this and how this >>>>>> might/could fit into our plans for user support, discussion, etc. >>>> >>>> Given that we already have email integration with GitHub, this will >>>> probably be easier to get through the ASF bureaucracy than something >>>> brand new. >>>> >>>> I'm willing to take this through Infra if people agree to it. It doesn't >>>> look like there are any separate "boards" or tags yet, so the proposal >>>> would likely be that discussions there would get emailed onto user@. The >>>> hard part will be getting replies to the thread on user@ to go back into >>>> the discussion on GH; we might be able to get an "asf-bot" to do this >>>> for us. >>>> >>>> I also looked at Infra's JIRA database, and no one has put in this >>>> request there yet. So, we'd be the first, with all the difficulties that >>>> entails. >>>> >>>> Can I get an informal "vote" on this approach and go-ahead? Since it's >>>> informal, anyone is encouraged to respond. >>>> >>>> -Joan "adopt, adapt, improve" Touzet >>>>
