+1 Thank you, Joan!
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 2:50 PM Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > Thanks Joan, I’m looking forward to Infra feedback. > > Best > Jan > — > > > On 22. May 2020, at 19:31, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > I haven't gotten a lot of feedback on this proposal. (I know a lot of > > people are marching towards deadlines right now.) I also don't want to take > > it to users@, unless there's a reality of it happening. > > > > In the interest of moving this forward, I'm going to open an exploratory > > issue with Infra to see how much work it'd be to make this happen. > > Hopefully, we're not the first people to ask. > > > > We'll still need a vote here, or on users@, before we would actually move > > activity to GH Discussions, but it won't be the gating factor for a while > > yet, I bet. > > > > FYI, per our project guidelines/bylaws, this would be a non-technical > > decision, allowing for lazy consensus and a lazy majority (3 binding +1s, > > more binding +1s than binding -1s), with binding votes cast by committers, > > and no vetos. > > > > -Joan > > > > On 2020-05-12 14:41, Joan Touzet wrote: > >> On 2020-05-12 5:46 a.m., Ilya Khlopotov wrote: > >>> I would be +1 as long as it works and we have options to migrate archive > >>> elsewhere if/when we need to. > >>> You are proposing to mirror email traffic which means that mail archive > >>> would have a complete history and spare the project from total vendor > >>> lock in. > >>> > >> Yup, that'd be a requirement from the ASF's perspective, regardless of > >> technology we select. > >> -Joan > >>> Best regards, > >>> ILYA > >>> > >>> On 2020/05/11 19:04:53, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> On 2020-03-15 9:36, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, at 14:35, Naomi Slater wrote: > >>>>>> apparently GitHub has discussions now. it's still in beta, but you can > >>>>>> specifically request it if you want it if you contact support, I think > >>>>>> > >>>>>> e.g., https://github.com/zeit/next.js/discussions > >>>>>> <https://github.com/zeit/next.js/discussions> > >>>>> > >>>>> interesting. > >>>>> > >>>>>> I'm interested to know what we think about this and how this > >>>>>> might/could fit into our plans for user support, discussion, etc. > >>>> > >>>> Given that we already have email integration with GitHub, this will > >>>> probably be easier to get through the ASF bureaucracy than something > >>>> brand new. > >>>> > >>>> I'm willing to take this through Infra if people agree to it. It doesn't > >>>> look like there are any separate "boards" or tags yet, so the proposal > >>>> would likely be that discussions there would get emailed onto user@. The > >>>> hard part will be getting replies to the thread on user@ to go back into > >>>> the discussion on GH; we might be able to get an "asf-bot" to do this > >>>> for us. > >>>> > >>>> I also looked at Infra's JIRA database, and no one has put in this > >>>> request there yet. So, we'd be the first, with all the difficulties that > >>>> entails. > >>>> > >>>> Can I get an informal "vote" on this approach and go-ahead? Since it's > >>>> informal, anyone is encouraged to respond. > >>>> > >>>> -Joan "adopt, adapt, improve" Touzet > >>>> >
