On 19 June 2013 12:54, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19 June 2013 08:05, David Crossley <[email protected]> wrote: >> David Crossley wrote: >>> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >>> > >>> > Is there anything else I need to do before [1] can be processed by >>> > infrastructure? >>> >>> I reviewed things a few days ago and i cannot see any problem. >>> Looking at other unresolved issues in that SvnPubSub Component >>> there does seem to be a general holdup. >>> >>> It is strange because you replied to the Assignee Gavin >>> immediately in early May. >> >> That has now been finished. >> >> Would someone else please adjust the Creadur Rat download page >> to point to the 0.9 release. (I do not do Maven.) > > I was about to update the download.xml page when I noticed that the > dist area [1] does not use binaries/ and source/ directories. > Is that intentional, or should I fix that first?
Also, in other TLPs with sub-components, the files are put in a fixed directory structure - i.e. the version does not appear in a directory name. For example commons lang: http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/lang/ http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/lang/binaries http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/lang/source The advantage is that all the current versions are together, and it's obvious which is source and which binary. The disadvantage is that it is a bit harder to see which versions are available, and removing stale versions is a bit harder. On reflection, I rather like the current creadur structure ! > [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/creadur/apache-rat-0.9/ > >> I will then do the remainder of the tidy-up at Incubator. >> >> -David >> >>> > Robert >>> > >>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6194
