On 19 June 2013 14:12, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19 June 2013 12:54, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 19 June 2013 08:05, David Crossley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> David Crossley wrote: >>>> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Is there anything else I need to do before [1] can be processed by >>>> > infrastructure? >>>> >>>> I reviewed things a few days ago and i cannot see any problem. >>>> Looking at other unresolved issues in that SvnPubSub Component >>>> there does seem to be a general holdup. >>>> >>>> It is strange because you replied to the Assignee Gavin >>>> immediately in early May. >>> >>> That has now been finished. >>> >>> Would someone else please adjust the Creadur Rat download page >>> to point to the 0.9 release. (I do not do Maven.) >> >> I was about to update the download.xml page when I noticed that the >> dist area [1] does not use binaries/ and source/ directories. >> Is that intentional, or should I fix that first? > > Also, in other TLPs with sub-components, the files are put in a fixed > directory structure - i.e. the version does not appear in a directory > name. > > For example commons lang: > > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/lang/ > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/lang/binaries > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/lang/source > > The advantage is that all the current versions are together, and it's > obvious which is source and which binary. > The disadvantage is that it is a bit harder to see which versions are > available, and removing stale versions is a bit harder. > > On reflection, I rather like the current creadur structure !
Sorry about the repeated checkins; I think it's all OK now. >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/creadur/apache-rat-0.9/ >> >>> I will then do the remainder of the tidy-up at Incubator. >>> >>> -David >>> >>>> > Robert >>>> > >>>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6194
